she Neurorights versus neuroprediction of crime and criminal recidivism

Main Article Content

Aura Itzel Ruiz Guaneros

Abstract

Research in neurocriminology has grown dramatically in recent years. Given the importance of the topic, the purpose of this article was to focus on one of the most controversial areas, nowadays with the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in the understanding of crime and criminal recidivism, the so-called prediction (neuroprediction) and the infringement of rights (neurorights) that this practice entails since it is necessary to regulate them in such a way that they prevent States from using technologies without consent and for punitive purposes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ruiz Guaneros, A. I. (2023). she Neurorights versus neuroprediction of crime and criminal recidivism. The Mexican Journal of Criminal Sicences , 7(21), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.57042/rmcp.v7i21.666
Section
Circumstances in the administration and administration of justice
Author Biography

Aura Itzel Ruiz Guaneros, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Penales

Investigadora-asistente del inacipe y miembro honoraria de la Fundación para el avance de las Neurociencias aplicadas al Derecho, la Ley y la Justicia (FNAD). Correo: aura.ruiz@inacipe.gob.mx

Métricas

References

Aharoni, E., Vincent, G. M., Harenski, C. L., Calhoun, V. D., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Gazzaniga, M. S. y Kiehl, K. A. (2013). “Neuroprediction of future rearrest”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(15), 6223-6228. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219302110

Bennett-Moses, L. y Chan, J. (2018). “Algorithmic prediction in policing: assumptions, evaluation, and accountability”. Policing and Society, 28(7), 806-822.

Bubic, A., Von Cramon, D. y Schubotz R. (2010). “Prediction, cognition and the brain”. Front. Hum. Neurosci, 4(25), 1-15. Doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00025

Coppola, F. (2018). “Mapping the brain to predict antisocial behaviour: new frontiers in neurocriminology, ‘new’ challenges for criminal justice”. ucl Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Special Issue 1, 103-126.

Cornet, L. J., de Kogel, C. H., Nijman, H. L., Raine, A. y van der Laan, P. H. (2015). “Neurobiological changes after intervention in individuals with anti-social behaviour: a literature review”. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health: cbmh, 25(1), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1915

Costa, A. M. (2010). “The economics of crime: a discipline to be invented and a Nobel Prize to be awarded”. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32, 648-661. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.07.010

Crockett, M. (2014). “Moral bioenhancement: a neuroscientific perspective”. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(6), 370-371.

Darby, R. (2018). “Neuroimaging abnormalities in neurological patients with criminal behavior”. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 18(8), 47.

Davis, N. and Koningsbruggen, M. (2013) “‘Non-invasive’ brain stimulation is not noninvasive”. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7(76),1-4.

Díaz, J. and Borbón, D. (2022). “Neurorights vs. neuroprediction and lie detection: The imperative limits to criminal law”. Front. Psychol, 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030439

Donaldson, Z. R. y Young, L. J. (2008). “Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality”. Science, 322, 900-904.

Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., and Loayza, N. (2002). “What causes violent crime?”. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46, 1323-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921 (01)00096-4

Fregni, F. y Pascual-Leone, A. (2007). “Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rtms and tdcs”. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, 3(7), 383-393.

Gaudet, L., Kerkmans, J., Anderson, N. y Kiehl, K. A. (2016). “Can neuroscience help predict future antisocial behavior?”. Fordham Law Review, 85(2), 503-531.

Glenn, A. L., Focquaert, F., Raine, A. (2015). “Prediction of Antisocial Behavior”. En Clausen, J., Levy, N. (eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_149

Glenn, A. y Raine, A. (2014). “Neurocriminology: implications for the punishment, prediction and prevention of criminal behaviour”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 54-63.

Hertz, N. (2023). “Neurorights-do we need new human rights? A reconsideration of the right to freedom of thought”. Neuroethics, 16(1), 1-15. 10.1007/s12152-022-09511-0

Ienca, M. y Andorno, R. (2021). “Hacia nuevos derechos humanos en la era de la neurociencia y la neurotecnología”. Análisis Filosófico, 41(1), 141-185.

Mahmud, N., Zinnah, K. I., Rahman, Y. A. y Ahmed, N. (2016). “Crimecast: A crime prediction and strategy direction service”. 19th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT). doi:10.1109/iccitechn.2016.7860234

Morse, S. (2015). “Neuroprediction: new technology, old problems”. Bioethica Forum, 8, 128-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2722765

Nadelhoffer, T., Bibas, S., Grafton, S., Kiehl, K. A., Mansfield, A., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., y Gazzaniga, M. (2012). “Neuroprediction, Violence, and the Law: Setting the Stage”. Neuroethics, 5(1), 67-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-010-9095-z

Poldrack, R. A., Monahan, J., Imrey, P. B., Reyna, V., Raichle, M. E., Faigman, D. y Buckholtz, J. W. (2018). “Predicting violent behavior: what can neuroscience add?”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.003

Pueyo, A. y Redondo, S. (2007). “La predicción de la violencia: entre la peligrosidad y la valoración del riesgo de violencia”. Papeles del Psicólogo, 28(3), 157-173. https://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1500.pdf

Rasmussen, K. (2014). “Neuroprediction, truth-sensitivity, and the law”. The Journal of Ethics, 18, 123-136. doi: 10.1007/s10892-014-9162-5

Ruiz, A. y Muñoz, J. (2020). “Neuroprevención: Un nuevo paradigma para el estudio de la reincidencia delictiva”. Revista Penal, (46), 221-229.

Ruiz, A. (2023). “Inteligencia artificial y neurocriminología ¿Leyendo el cerebro para ‘predecir’ futuros delitos?”. En Nava, A. (coord.). Inteligencia artificial y derecho (pp.149-167). México: Porrúa.

Ruiz, A. y Muñoz, J. (2021). “Neuroprevention: developing legal policies in risk assessment without aspiring to predict crime”. Journal of Science and Law, 9(1), 1-5. doi:10.35005/y991-wv96.

Schmidt, S. (2009). “Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences”. Rev. Gen. Psychol, 13(2), 90-100.

Shah, N., Bhagat, N. y Shah, M. (2021). “Crime forecasting: a machine learning and computer vision approach to crime prediction and prevention. Visual computing for industry”. Biomedicine and Art, 4(1),1-14. Doi:10.1186/s42492-021-00075-z

Tortora L., Meynen G., Bijlsma J., Tronci, E. y Ferracuti, S. (2020). “Neuroprediction and ai in forensic psychiatry and criminal justice: a neurolaw perspective”. Front. Psychol, 11(220),1-9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00220

UNESCO (1999). “Declaración sobre la ciencia y el uso del saber científico”. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000116994_spa

UNODC (2018). “Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and ai”. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Yuste, R., Goering, S., Arcas, B. A. Y., Bi, G., Carmena, J. M., Carter, A., Fins, J. J., Friesen, P., Gallant, J., Huggins, J. E., Illes, J., Kellmeyer, P., Klein, E., Marblestone, A., Mitchell, C., Parens, E., Pham, M., Rubel, A., Sadato, N., Sullivan, L. S. y Wolpaw, J. (2017). Nature, 551(7679), 159-163. https://doi.org/10.1038/551159a

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.