Abordajes restaurativos y cultura de paz ante un siglo de incertidumbre
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article offers a study about the reasons by which restorative justice and restorative practices are nowadays discussed: what
do they restore? With what purpose? The personal dimension of the restorative approach is explored by three fundamental principles: the action-subject separation, the high-level control relationships and support, and finally the construction of a culture that promotes the community’s participation and the authoritie’s transparency. Later, the community’s dimension in a restorative approach is described based on some experiences in the Judicial System and in the Education Ministry of Costa Rica.
Lastly, the text makes a critical discussion related to the 21st century, to global, technological and cultural change, and to the necessity of building a culture of peace with a restorative approach as an answer to the challenges of our time.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Métricas
References
Block, P. (2008). Community: The structure of belonging. San Francisco, CA, US: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Braithwaite, J. (2018). “Minimally Sufficient Deterrence”. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. 47:69-118.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1990). “Discovering what families do”. In Rebuilding the Nest: A New Commitment to the American Family. Family Service America.
Christie, N. (1977). “Conflicts as property”. British Journal of Criminology. 17 (1): 1-15.
CONAMAJ. (2010). En círculo construimos la protección de nuestra niñez y adolescencia. San José, Costa Rica: CONAMAJ. Disponible en: https://justiciarestaurativa.poder-judicial.go.cr/images/publicaciones/27.pdf
Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Golan, D., Barsillai, M. & Katzir, T. (2018). “The effect of presentation mode on children’s reading preferences, performance, and self-evaluations”. Computers & Education. 126: 146-158.
Kim, W.C. & Mauborgne, R. (2003). “Fair Process. Managing in the Knowledge Economy”. Harvard Business Review. The Best of HBR: 127-136.
McCold, P. (2000). “Toward a mid-range theory of restorative criminal justice: A reply to the Maximalist model”. Contemporary Justice Review. 3(4): 357-414.
Nathanson, D. L. (1992). Shame and Pride: Affect, sex, and the birth of the self. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Neff, K. & Costigan, A. (2014). “Self Compassion, wellbeing and happiness”. Psychologie in Österreich. 2(3): 114-119.
O’Connell, T., Wachtel, B. & Wachtel, T. (2006). Manual de Reuniones Restaurativas. El nuevo manual de capacitación Real Justice. Costa Rica: Real Justice.
Poder Judicial República de Costa Rica. (2018). Política Institucional. Disponible en: https://justiciarestaurativa.poder-judicial.go.cr/index.php/politica
Pranis, K. (2006). Manual para facilitadores de Círculos. San José, Costa Rica: CONAMAJ. Disponible en: https://justiciarestaurativa.poder-judicial.go.cr/images/publicaciones/11.pdf
Rosenberg, M. (2014). The Surprising Purpose of Anger: Beyond Anger Management: Finding the Gift (Nonviolent Communication Guides). CA: Puddle Dancer Press.
Sherman, L. & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative Justice: The Evidence. London: Smith Institute.
Wachtel, T. (2000). Introduction to Restorative Practices. Pennsylvania: IIRP.
Wachtel, T. (2013). “Definiendo qué es restaurativo”. International Institute for Restorative Practices. Pennsylvania, EEUU: IIRP.
Weingarten, K. (2003). Common shock: Witnessing violence every day: How we are harmed, how we can heal. New York, NY, US: Dutton/Penguin Books.