Elementos del Common Law en el Derecho Penal Internacional
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper compares different criminal types and selected figures from fundamental criminal law found in Common Law and in international criminal law in order to find out how this law tradition has influenced this branch of international law. After examining juristic writings and judicial decisions the author comes to the conclusion that this influence has not been as considerable as commonly thought. Nonetheless Common Law can provide several tools for systematization and analysis that could contribute to a better understanding of international criminal law
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
"Ambos, K. ¿Qué significa ‘la intención de destruir’ en el delito de genocidio?, Revista Penal, núm. 26, julio de 2010 (p.p. 46-64).
Ambos, K. Fundamentos de la imputación en el Derecho internacional penal, Porrúa, México, 2009 (p.p. 119-156).
Ambos, K. La Parte General del Derecho Penal Internacional, trad. de Ezequiel Malarino, Duncker & Humbolt/ Temis/Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, Montevideo, 2005, (p.p. 384-399).
Ashworth, A. Principles of Criminal Law, 4ᵃ ed. Oxford, 2003.
Bos, A. From the International Law Commission to the Rome Conference (1994-1998), en Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta y John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, vol. 1, Oxford University Press, 2002 (p.p. 35-64).
Christensen, R. Getting to Peace by Reconciling Notions of Justice: The Importance of Considering Discrepancies between Civil and Common Legal Systems in the Formation of the International Criminal Court, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, otoño-invierno de 2001-2002 (p.p. 391-423).
Director of Public Prosecutions v. Morgan, HOUSE OF LORDS [1976] AC 182 [1975] 2 All ER 347, [1975], 30 de abril de 1975.
Dondé Matute, J. Tipos penales en el ámbito internacional, Ubijus, México/Lima, 2012.
Dörman, K. Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the Internacional Criminal Court– Sources and Commentary, ICRC, Cambridge, 2002 (p.p. 11 y 12).
Dubber, M. D. Criminal Law. Model Penal Code, Foundation Press, Nueva York, 2002.
Gainer, R. L. The Culpability Provisions of the Model Penal Code, Rutgers Law Journal, vol. 19, 1988 (p.p. 575 y 581).
Garnett v. State, Court of Appeals of Maryland, 332 Md. 571, 632 A. 2d 797, 1993.
Gibson, C. H. Testing the Legitimacy of the Joint Criminal Enterprise Doctrine in the icty: A Comparison of Individual Liability for Group Conduct in International and Domestic Law, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, vol. 18, 2007-2008 (p.521).
Johnson, P. E. y Cloud, M. Criminal Law: Cases, Materials and Text, 7a ed., West Group, St. Paul, 2002.
Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 (1946).
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 US 558 (2003).
Levenson, L.L. The Glannon Guide to Criminal Law, Aspen Publishers, Nueva York, 2005 (p.p. 26-29).
Marcus, P. Conspiracy: the Criminal Agreement in Theory and in Practice, Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 95, 1976-1977.
Marston Danner, A. y Martínez, J.S. Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility, and the Development of International Criminal Law, California Law Review, vol. 93, núm. 75, 2005.
Morrissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246 (1952).
Noferi, M. Towards Attenuation: a ‘New’ Due Process Limit on Pinkerton Conspiracy Liability, American Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 91, 2005-2006.
Ohlin, J D. Joint Intentions to Commit International Crimes, Chicago Journal of International Law, vol. 10, invierno de 2010-2011.
Ohlin, J. D. Joint Criminal Confusion, New Criminal Law Review, vol. 12, núm. 3, verano de 2009.
Olásolo Alonso, H. El impacto de la primera jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional en la distinción entre autoría y participación en la comisión de crímenes de guerra conforma al Derecho internacional, Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas, Universidad Central de Venezuela, núm. 132, 2008.
Olásolo Alonso, H. Estudios de Derecho Penal Internacional, INACIPE, México, 2010 (p.p. 113-133).
People v. Decina, 2 N.Y.2d 133
People v. Marrero, Court of Appeals of New York, 69 N.Y. 2d 382, 515 N.Y.S. 2d 212, 1987.
People v. Newton, 8 Cal. App.3d 359.
Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946).
Prosecutor v. Akayesu, ICTR-96-4-T (Trial Chamber), 2 de septiembre de 1998.
Prosecutor v. Bagilishema, ICTR-95-1A-T (Trial Chamber I), 7 de junio de 2001.
Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze and Nsengiyumva, ICTR-96-7 (Trial Chamber), 18 de diciembre de 2008.
Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze and Nsengiyumva, ICTR-98-41-T (Trial Chamber).
Prosecutor v. Bemba, Confirmation of Charges, ICC-01/05-01/08 (Pre-Trial Chamber II), 15 de junio de 2009.
Prosecutor v. Bikindi, ICTR-01-72-T (Trial Chamber), 2 de diciembre de 2008.
Prosecutor v. Blagojevic and Jokic, it-02-60 (Trial Chamber), 17 de enero de 2005.
Prosecutor v. Blaskic, IT-95-14-A (Appeals Chamber), 29 de julio de 2004.
Prosecutor v. Blaskic, IT-95-14-T (Trial Chamber), 3 de marzo de 2000.
Prosecutor v. Brdjanin, IT-99-36-T (Trial Chamber), 1º de septiembre de 2004.
Prosecutor v. Delalic et al. IT-96-21, Judgement (Appeals Chamber), 20 de febrero de 2001.
Prosecutor v. Delalic et al. IT-96-21-T (Trial Chamber), 16 de noviembre de 1998.
Prosecutor v. Furundzija, IT-95-17/1-T (Trial Chamber), 10 de diciembre de 1998.
Prosecutor v. Gacumbitsi, ICTR-01-64 (Appeals Chamber), 7 de julio de 2006.
Prosecutor v. Kajelijeli, ICTR-98-44-A (Trial Chamber), 1º de diciembre de 2003.
Prosecutor v. Kamuhanda, ICTR-99-54 (Trial Chamber), 22 de enero de 2004.
Prosecutor v. Katanga and Chui, Confirmation of charges, ICC-01/04-01/07 (Pre-Trial Chamber I), 30 de septiembre de 2008.
Prosecutor v. Kayishema and Ruzindana, ICTR-95-1-T (Trial Chamber), 21 de mayo de 1999.
Prosecutor v. Kordic and Cerkez, IT-95-14/2 (Appeals Chamber), 17 de diciembre de 2004.
Prosecutor v. Kordic and Cerkez, IT-95-42/2-T (Trial Chamber), 26 de febrero de 2001.
Prosecutor v. Krnojelac, it-97-25 (Appeals Chamber), 17 de septiembre de 2003.
Prosecutor v. Kunarac, IT-96-23 & 23/1 (Appeals Chamber), 12 de junio de 2002.
Prosecutor v. Kunarac, IT-96-23 & 23/1 (Trial Chamber), 22 de febrero de 2001.
Prosecutor v. Limaj et al. IT-03-66-T (Trial Chamber), 30 de noviembre de 2005.
Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Confirmation of Charges, ICC-01/04-01/06 (Pre-Trial Chamber I), 27 de enero de 2007.
Prosecutor v. Muhimana, ICTR-95-1B (Trial Chamber), 28 de abril de 2005.
Prosecutor v. Musema, ICTR-96-13-T (Trial Chamber I), 27 de enero de 2000.
Prosecutor v. Muvunyi, ICTR-00-55 (Trial Chamber), 12 de septiembre de 2006.
Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza and Ngeze (Appeals Chamber), Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen, 28 de noviembre de 2007.
Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza and Ngeze, ICTR-99-52-A (Appeals Chamber), 28 de noviembre de 2007.
Prosecutor v. Ntakirutimana and Ntakirutimana, ICTR-96-10A & 17A (Appeals Chamber), 13 de diciembre de 2004.
Prosecutor v. Nzabirinda, ICTR-01-77-T (Trial Chamber), 23 de febrero de 2007.
Prosecutor v. Semanza, ICTR-97-20-T (Trial Chamber), 15 de mayo de 2003.
Prosecutor v. Seromba, ICTR-2001-66-I (Trial Chamber), 13 de diciembre de 2006.
Prosecutor v. Strugar, IT- 01-42 (Trial Chamber), 31 de enero de 2005.
Prosecutor v. Tadic, IT-94-1 (Appeals Chamber), 15 de julio de 1999.
Prosecutor v. Thirith et al. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (ptc38), Decision on Appeals of the Co-Investigative Judges on Joint Criminal Enterprise (Pre-Trial Chamber), 20 de mayo de 2010.
Regina v. Faulkner, Ireland, Court of Crown Cases Reversed, 13 Cox Crim. Cases 550, 1877.
Robinson v. California, 370 US 660 (1962).
Robinson, P. H. y Grall, J.A. Element Analysis in Defining Criminal Liability: The Model Penal Code and beyond, Stanford Law Review, vol. 35 (p.p. 681-768).
Sayre, F. B. Criminal conspiracy. Harvard Law Review, vol. 35, 1921-1922 (p.p. 393-427).
Sigler, H. J. Federal Criminal Conspiracy. American Criminal Law Review, vol. 46, 2009.
Simons, K. S. Should the Model Penal Code’s Mens Rea Provisions be Amended? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 1, 2003.
Singer, R. The Model Penal Code and Three, Two (Possibly One) Tays Courts Avoid Mens Rea, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, vol. 4, núm. 139, 2000 (p.p. 206 y 207).
Smith, J. C, y Hogan, B. Criminal Law, 9ª ed. Butterworths, Londres, 1999.
Tallgren, I. Sense and Sensibility of International Criminal Law, European Journal of International Law, 2002, vol. 13, núm. 3 (p.p. 561-595).
Triffterer, O. Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2ª ed. Beck/Hart/Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2008 (p.p. 758 y 759).
United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671 (1975).
United States v. Jewell, United States Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 1976, 532 F.2d 697; States v. Coates, Supreme Court of Washington, 107 Wash. 2d 882, 735 P.2d 64, 1987.
United States v. Weitzenhoff, United States Courts of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 1 F 3d 1523, 1993.
United States v. Yermian, 468 U.S. 63 (1984).
Watkins, J. L. y DeFalco, R. L. Joint Criminal Enterprise and the Jurisdiction of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Camboya. Rutgers Law Review, vol. 63, 2010 (p.193).
Wayne, R. LaFave, Criminal Law, 3a ed. West Group, St. Paul, 2000 (p.p. 207 y 208) (Hornbook Series).
Wechsler, H. The Challenge of a Model Penal Code, Harvard Law Review, vol. 65, 1951- 1952.
Wechsler, H. y Jerome M. A Rationale of the Law of Homicide, Columbia Law Review, vol. 37, núm. 5, mayo de 1937 (p.p. 701-761).
Werle, G. Principles of International Criminal Law, T.M.C./Asser Press, La Haya, 2005 (p.p. 102-116)."