La evolución del retrato hablado del lápiz y el papel a los algoritmos genéticos
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El retrato hablado es una técnica frecuentemente utilizada en la investigación policial. Sin embargo, la investigación de laboratorio indica que el nivel de identificación de un rostro, a partir de un retrato hablado, es bajo. Una de las razones de esto es que el retrato hablado tradicional no se aproxima a los procesos de reconocimiento facial humano. En las últimas dos décadas se han creado sistemas de cuarta generación, basados en programación evolutiva con algoritmos genéticos, cuya principal característica es la combinación y evolución de rostros completos que gradualmente pueden converger en un rostro objetivo. El sistema Caramex II, basado en las características antropométricas del rostro de la población mexicana, pretende utilizar una aproximación evolutiva para construir retratos hablados.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Métricas
Citas
Behrmann, M., Richler, J.J., Avidan, G., y Kimchi, R. (2015). “Holistic face perception”. Oxford handbook of perceptual organization, 758-774.
Boutsen, L., y Humphreys, G.W. (2003). “The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and ‘Thatcherized’ faces”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56(6), 955-975.
Brace, N.A., Pike, G.E., Allen, P., y Kemp, R.I. (2006). “Identifying composites of famous faces: Investigating memory, language, and system issues”. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(4), 351-366.
Brace, N., Pike, G., y Kemp, R. (2000). “Investigating E-FIT using famous faces”. Forensic psychology and law, 272-276.
Carbon, C.C., y Leder, H. (2005). “When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces”. Perception, 34(9), 1117-1134.
Cootes, T.F., y Taylor, C.J. (2001, July). “Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision”. Medical Imaging 2001: Image Processing (Vol. 4322, pp. 236-248). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., y Taylor, C.J. (1998, June). “Active appearance models”. European conference on computer vision (pp. 484-498). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Craw, I., y Cameron, P. (1991). “Parameterising images for recognition and reconstruction”. In BMVC91 (pp. 367-370). Springer, London. Craw, I., y Cameron, P. (1992). “Face recognition by computer”. In BMVC92 (pp. 498-507). Springer, London.
Davies, G. (1986). “Capturing likeness in eyewitness composites: The police artist and his rivals”. Medicine, Science, and the Law, 26(4), 283-290.
Davies, G., y Oldman, H. (1999). “The impact of character attribution on composite production: A real world effect?” Current Psychology, 18(1), 128-139.
Davies, G., y Valentine, T. (2007). “Facial composites: Forensic utility and psychological research”. The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Volume II (pp. 73-98). Psychology Press.
Davies, G., Van der Willik, P., y Morrison, L.J. (2000). “Facial composite production: A comparison of mechanical and computer-driven systems”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 119.
Dodson, C.S., Johnson, M.K., y Schooler, J.W. (1997). “The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition”. Memory & Cognition, 25(2), 129-139.
Ellis, H.D. (1986). “Introduction to aspects of face processing: Ten questions in need of answers”. Aspects of face processing (pp. 3-13). Springer, Dordrecht.
Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W., y Davies, G.M. (1979). “Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition”. Perception, 8(4), 431-439.
Fallshore, M. y Schooler, J.W. (1995). “Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1608.
Fisher, R.P., y Geiselman, R.E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Fodarella, C., Kuivaniemi-Smith, H., Gawrylowicz, J., y Frowd, C. (2015). “Forensic procedures for facial-composite construction”. Journal of Forensic Practice, 17(4), 259-270.
Frowd C.D. (2001). “EvoFIT: a holistic, evolutionary facial imaging system”. PhD thesis, University of Stirling.
Frowd, C.D., Valentine, T. y Davis, J. (2015a). “Facial composites and techniques to improve image recognizability”. Forensic facial identification: Theory and practice of identification from eyewitnesses, composites, and CCTV, 43-70.
Frowd, C.D., Erickson, W.B., Lampinen, J.M., Skelton, F.C., McIntyre, A.H. y Hancock, P.J. (2015b). “A decade of evolving composites: regression and meta-analysis”. Journal of Forensic Practice.
Frowd, C.D., Skelton, F., Hepton, G., Holden, L., Minahil, S., Pitchford, M. y Hancock, P.J. (2013). “Whole-face procedures for recovering facial images from memory”. Science & Justice, 53(2), 89-97.
Frowd, C.D., Carson, D., Ness, H., Richardson, J., Morrison, L., Mclanaghan, S. y Hancock, P. (2005b). “A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems”. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(1), 33-52
Frowd, C.D., Hancock, P.J. y Carson, D. (2004). “EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites”. ACM Transactions on applied perception (TAP), 1(1), 19-39.
Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., Ness, H., Bowie, L., Paterson, J., Thomson-Bogner, C. & Hancock, P.J. (2007a). “Parallel approaches to composite production: interfaces that behave contrary to expectation”. Ergonomics, 50(4), 562-585.
Frowd, C., Bruce, V., Ross, D., McIntyre, A., y Hancock, P.J. (2007b). “An application of caricature: how to improve the recognition of facial composites”. Visual Cognition, 15(8), 954-984.
Frowd, C., Park, J., McIntyre, A., Bruce, V., Pitchford, M., Fields, S. y Hancock, P.J. (2008, August). “Effecting an improvement to the fitness function. How to evolve a more identifiable face”. 2008 Bio-inspired, Learning and Intelligent Systems for Security (pp. 3-10). IEEE.
Frowd, C.D., Pitchford, M., Bruce, V., Jackson, S., Hepton, G., Greenall, M. y Hancock, P.J. (2011b). “The psychology of face construction: giving evolution a helping hand”. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 195-203.
Frowd, C., Nelson, L., Skelton, F., Noyce, R., Atkins, R., Heard, P. y Hancock, P.J. (2012a). “Interviewing techniques for Darwinian facial‐composite systems”. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 576-584.
Frowd, C.D., Pitchford, M., Skelton, F., Petkovic, A., Prosser, C. y Coates, B. (2012b, September). “Catching even more offenders with EvoFIT facial composites”. 2012 Third International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies (pp. 20-26). IEEE. Frowd, C.D., Skelton, F., Atherton, C., Pitchford, M., Hepton, G., Holden, L. y Hancock, P.J. (2012d). “Recovering faces from memory: The distracting influence of external facial features”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 224.
Frowd, C.D., Jones, S., Fodarella, C., Skelton, F., Fields, S., Williams, A. y Date, L. (2014). “Configural and featural information in facial-composite images”. Science & Justice, 54(3), 215-227.
Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., McIntyre, A.H., Ross, D., Fields, S., Plenderleith, Y. y Hancock, P.J. (2006). “Implementing holistic dimensions for a facial composite system”. Journal of Multimedia, 1(3), 42-51.
Gibson, S.J., Solomon, C.J., Maylin, M.I. y Clark, C. (2009). “New methodology in facial composite construction: From theory to practice”. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 2(2), 156-168.
Hancock, P.J., Bruce, V. y Burton, A.M. (2000). “Recognition of unfamiliar faces”. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(9), 330-337.
Hole, G.J. (1994). “Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces”. Perception, 23(1), 65-74.
Innocence Project (2016): Reevaluating lineups: why witness make mistakes and how to reduce the chance of a misidentification. Recuperado de: https://www.innocenceproject.org/reevaluating-lineups-why-witnesses-make-mistakes-and-how-to-reduce-the-chance-of-a-misidentification/
Kurt, B., Etaner-Uyar, A.S., Akbal, T., Demir, N., Kanlikilicer, A.E., Kus, M.C. y Ulu, F.H. (2006, September). “Active appearance model-based facial composite generation with interactive nature-inspired heuristics”. International Workshop on Multimedia Content Representation, Classification and Security (pp. 183-190). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Laughery, K.R. y Fowler, R.H. (1980). “Sketch artist and Identi-kit procedures for recalling faces”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(3), 307.
Mohammadzade, H., Sayyafan, A. y Ghojogh, B. (2018). “Pixel-Level Alignment of Facial Images for High Accuracy Recognition Using Ensemble of Patches”. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 35. 10.1364/JOSAA.35.001149.
Rossion, B. (2008). “Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception”. Acta psychologica, 128(2), 274-289.
Ryan, R.S., y Schooler, J.W. (1998). “Whom do words hurt? Individual differences in susceptibility to verbal overshadowing”. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 12(7), S105-S125.
Schooler, J.W., y Engstler-Schooler, T.Y. (1990). “Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid”. Cognitive psychology, 22(1), 36-71.
Serrano, S.C. (2013). “Un sistema automatizado de identificación de rasgos faciales (retrato hablado) para la población mexicana”. La bibliotecología y la documentación en el contexto de la internacionalización y el acceso abierto. (Coord.) Jaime Ríos Ortega y César Augusto Ramírez Velázquez. México, UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información.
Serrano, C., Villanueva, M., Luy, J. y Link, K.F. (1997). “El proyecto ‘La cara del mexicano’. Un sistema de retrato hablado asistido por computadora para la población mexicana.” Boletín de Enlaces: 26-28, Coordinación de Humanidades, UNAM, México.
Sirovich, L. y Kirby, M. (1987). “Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces”. Josa a, 4(3), 519-524.
Solomon, C.J., Gibson, S.J. y Pallares-Bejarano, A. (2005). “Eigenfit–the generation of photographic-quality facial composites”. The Journal of Forensic Science.
Solomon, C.J., Gibson, S.J. y Mist, J.J. (2013). “Interactive evolutionary generation of facial composites for locating suspects in criminal investigations”. Applied Soft Computing, 13(7), 3298-3306.
Sporer, S.L. (2007). “Person descriptions as retrieval cues: Do they really help?” Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(6), 591-609.
Tanaka, J.W. y Farah, M.J. (1993). “Parts and wholes in face recognition”. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 46(2), 225-245.
Tanaka, J.W. y Simonyi, D. (2016). “The ‘parts and wholes’ of face recognition: A review of the literature”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(10), 1876-1889.
Taylor, K.T. (2000). Forensic art and illustration. CRC Press.
Thompson, P. (1980). “Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion”. Perception.
Tredoux, C. (1999). “Statistical considerations when determining measures of lineup size and lineup bias”. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 13(S1), S9-S26.
Tredoux, C., Nunez, D., Oxtoby, O. y Prag, B. (2006). “An evaluation of ID: an eigenface based construction system: reviewed article.” South African Computer Journal, 2006(37), 90-97.
Troje, N.F. y Vetter, T. (1996). Representations of human faces. Max-Planck-Institut Tubingen
Turk, M. y Pentland, A. (1991). “Eigenfaces for recognition”. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 3(1), 71-86.
Valentine, T. (1988). “Upside‐down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition”. British journal of psychology, 79(4), 471-491.
Valentine, T. (1991). “A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(2), 161-204.
Valentine, T. (Ed.). (2002). Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition: Explorations in face space. Routledge.
Valentine, T., Davis, J.P., Thorner, K., Solomon, C. y Gibson, S. (2010). “Evolving and combining facial composites: Between-witness and within-witness morphs compared”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(1), 72.
Villanueva, S.G. (2010). Morfología facial. Estudios en población mexicana a través de fotografías digitales. México, UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas.
Wells, G.L., Charman, S.D., y Olson, E.A. (2005). “Building face composites can harm lineup identification performance”. Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, 11(3), 147.
Zahradnikova, B., Duchovicova, S. y Schreiber, P. (2018). “Facial composite systems”. Artificial Intelligence Review, 49(1), 131-152.
Žalik, Borut (2005). “An efficient sweep-line Delaunay triangulation algorithm”. Computer-Aided Design, 37 (10), pp. 1027-1038.