El análisis del testimonio desde una concepción racionalista de la prueba

Abstract

In the vast majority of trials, the witness evidence is the one that is most presented. However, knowing how to assess it in a reasoned way in order to avoid or reduce judicial mistake is a mandatory task for all procedural intervening parties. So at present, this article will address the various points and parameters already studied, established and accepted by the testimony psychology from a rationalist conception of the evidence, in order to find an objective and reasoned assessment that allows, above all, to reduce judicial error when decisions are made based on objective parameters regarding how much degree of reliability can be attributed to a testimony after having carried out a rational analysis.