The performance measurement of citizen security programs in Mexico
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this text is to present a theoretical discussion regarding the rol of performance measurement in the improvement of policies and programs for citizen security. The discussion aims to understand the capacity of the citizen security institutions for learning and improving their performance. The text is organized as follows: the first section discusses the use of utilitarian and deonthological models for performance measurement in citizen security; the second section builds on the debate between policy analysis and policy sciences regarding the rol of evidence and rational models in decision-making on citizen security; finally, the third section discusses a proposal for performance measurement through eight purposes.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Métricas
References
Aguilar, L. F. (2013). El gobierno del gobierno. Ciudad de México: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.
Behn, B. (2003). “Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures”. Public Administration Review. Vol. 63, No. 5.
Bentham, J. (1988). The principles of morals and legislation. Prometheus Books: Nueva York.
Cohen, M., March, J.G. y Olsen, J.P. (1972). “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice”. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1-25.
Dror, Y. (1964). “Muddling Through, `science´or inertia?”. Public Administration Review. Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 153-157.
Etzioni, A. (1967). “Mixed-Scanning: a Third Approach to Decision-Making”. Public Administration Review. No. XXVII, p. 385-392.
Hatry, H. (1999). Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington D.C. Urban Institute.
Kaplan, R. S. y David P. Norton. (1992). “The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance”. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 70, No. 1, p. 71-91.
Kerr, S. (1975). “On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B”. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 18. No. 4, p. 769-83.
Kingdon, J. (1995). “Agenda Setting”. Public Policy. The Essential Readings. p. 105-113.
Laswell, H. (1951). “The Policy Orientation”. The Policy Sciences. Stanford University Press, p. 3-15.
Lindblom, C. (1959). “The Science of Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, p. 79-88.
Lindblom, C. (1980). The Policy-making Process. Prentice-Hall.
Moore, M. (1997). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
Moore, M. (2013). Recognizing Public Value. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
Simon, H. (1957). “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice”. Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.
Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis. Little, Brown.
Wilson, W. (1887). “The study of administration”. Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 2. No. 2, p. 197-222.